A Comprehensive Movie Examination of Twelve Angry Men
The movie Twelve Angry Men commences with an eighteen yr outdated boy from the ghetto who's on trial for the murder of his abusive dad. A jury of twelve men will be locked in the deliberation space to choose the fate of the young boy. All evidence is usually against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electronic seat. The judge informs the jurors that they are confronted with a grave decision and that the courtroom would not entertain any works of mercy for the boy if discovered guilty.
Even prior to the deliberation talks start it really is apparent almost all of the men are certain the boy is definitely guilty. However, when the original poll is used Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) registers a shocking not liable vote. Immediately the bedroom is in uproar. All of those other jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily opt to humor the juror #8 (Henry Fonda) by agreeing to go over the trial for one hour. Ultimately, as the talks proceed juror #8 slowly undermines their confidence by declaring that the murder weapon is usually widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the main element witness is suspect. Gradually they are earned over by his arguments and also the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly will abide by him. Their verdict is now a good not guilty.
Coming to a unanimous not liable verdict will not come easily. The jury encounters many troubles in understanding how to communicate and cope with one another. What seems